- Research
- Open access
- Published:
Genomic insights into novel extremotolerant bacteria isolated from the NASA Phoenix mission spacecraft assembly cleanrooms
Microbiome volume 13, Article number: 117 (2025)
Abstract
Background
Human-designed oligotrophic environments, such as cleanrooms, harbor unique microbial communities shaped by selective pressures like temperature, humidity, nutrient availability, cleaning reagents, and radiation. Maintaining the biological cleanliness of NASA’s mission-associated cleanrooms, where spacecraft are assembled and tested, is critical for planetary protection. Even with stringent controls such as regulated airflow, temperature management, and rigorous cleaning, resilient microorganisms can persist in these environments, posing potential risks for space missions.
Results
During the Phoenix spacecraft mission, genomes of 215 bacterial isolates were sequenced and based on overall genome-related indices, 53 strains belonging to 26 novel species were recognized. Metagenome mapping indicated less than 0.1% of the reads associated with novel species, suggesting their rarity. Genes responsible for biofilm formation, such as BolA (COG0271) and CvpA (COG1286), were predominantly found in proteobacterial members but were absent in other non-spore-forming and spore-forming species. YqgA (COG1811) was detected in most spore-forming members but was absent in Paenibacillus and non-spore-forming species. Cell fate regulators, COG1774 (YaaT), COG3679 (YlbF, YheA/YmcA), and COG4550 (YmcA, YheA/YmcA), controlling sporulation, competence, and biofilm development processes, were observed in all spore-formers but were missing in non-spore-forming species. COG analyses further revealed resistance-conferring proteins in all spore-formers (n = 13 species) and eight actinobacterial species, responsible for enhanced membrane transport and signaling under radiation (COG3253), transcription regulation under radiation stress (COG1108), and DNA repair and stress responses (COG2318). Additional functional analysis revealed that Agrococcus phoenicis, Microbacterium canaveralium, and Microbacterium jpeli contained biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for ε-poly-L-lysine, beneficial in food preservation and biomedical applications. Two novel Sphingomonas species exhibited for zeaxanthin, an antioxidant beneficial for eye health. Paenibacillus canaveralius harbored genes for bacillibactin, crucial for iron acquisition. Georgenia phoenicis had BGCs for alkylresorcinols, compounds with antimicrobial and anticancer properties used in food preservation and pharmaceuticals.
Conclusion
Despite stringent decontamination and controlled environmental conditions, cleanrooms harbor unique bacterial species that form biofilms, resist various stressors, and produce valuable biotechnological compounds. The reduced microbial competition in these environments enhances the discovery of novel microbial diversity, contributing to the mitigation of microbial contamination and fostering biotechnological innovation.
Video Abstract
Introduction
Cleanrooms and other human-designed oligotrophic environments present distinct ecosystems that may expedite microbial speciation due to unique selective pressures [1]. These pressures may arise from specialized construction materials, controlled temperature and humidity, and exposure to cleaning agents, diverging from more nutrient-rich natural settings [2]. Such environments select microbes that can survive nutrient-poor conditions, potentially giving rise to new species [3]. Globally, human activities transport microbes to different oligotrophic environments, like cleanrooms, facilitating distinctive evolutionary trajectories [2]. Despite the resource-limited conditions, microbial communities in these controlled environments are complex and competitive. The isolation of rare microbes from cleanroom environments is influenced by long-term selective pressures, such as desiccation, repeated sterilization, and low-nutrient availability, which shape microbial survival strategies over years to decades [4, 5].
Ensuring the biological cleanliness of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration’s (NASA) mission-associated cleanrooms, where spacecraft are assembled and tested, is imperative to meet planetary protection requirements [6]. These facilities undergo constant monitoring to detect and assess the presence of any microorganisms that could potentially survive a transfer to an extraterrestrial environment via robotic exploration devices [7,8,9]. Despite meticulous control measures, including regulation of airflow, humidity, temperature, and air particulate concentrations, along with rigorous cleaning using chemical detergents, UV radiation, and hydrogen peroxide, certain microorganisms can persist in this challenging and nutrient-limited environment [5, 10,11,12].
The “cleanroom effect” may provide a platform for microorganisms to adapt to selective pressures (i.e., extreme oligotrophy, low-humidity, and desiccation conditions), bolstering their growth, survival, lifestyle, and resilience under extreme conditions, and the production of specialized metabolites [12, 13]. It is crucial to characterize these resistant microbes, which defy conventional biological control measures and potentially identify novel microbial species. This effort is pivotal for monitoring the risk of forward microbial contamination and safeguarding extraterrestrial environments against unintentional colonization of exploring planets [14].
During the Phoenix mission, 215 strains were isolated from the Kennedy Space Center-Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (KSC-PHSF) cleanroom floors under various extreme conditions [10], and whole genome sequencing (WGS) of all 215 isolates was performed during this study. The central objectives of this study were to characterize a cohort of 53 strains, representing 26 previously unidentified bacterial species discovered among Phoenix mission isolates. These strains were subjected to extensive examination, which included characterizing their physiological attributes, and conducting thorough genome analysis, followed by in-depth phylogenomic assessments. Evaluations were performed to determine the incidence, prevalence, and persistence of these novel species even after 9 years by analyzing metagenomic reads sourced from several NASA cleanrooms, including KSC-PHSF. In parallel, an investigation into the genomic functions of these extremotolerants was undertaken, with a particular emphasis on the discovery of potential genes responsible for radiation resistance and secondary metabolites, indicative of their adaptive capacity and biotechnological applications (Supplementary Figure S1).
Results
Based on WGS, the bacterial strains (n = 215) isolated from the KSC-PHSF were classified into three phyla: Actinomycetota, Bacillota, and Pseudomonadota. Furthermore, around 25% of the bacterial strains (53 out of 215 isolates) were identified as belonging to 26 novel species and most of them belong to the members of the class Bacilli (47.7%), Alphaproteobacteria (24.5%), Gammaproteobacteria (13.9%), and Actinomycetia (13.9%). The percent occurrence of the novel species at the family level is given in Supplementary Figure S2. Among 53 strains, these 26 species had not been previously described, encompassing 18 genera. Within these 53 novel bacterial strains, 33 strains were isolated before the arrival of the Phoenix mission spacecraft to the KSC-PHSF cleanroom (21 novel species), 7 were cultured during the assembly and testing of the spacecraft (3 novel species), and 13 were isolated from the cleanroom floors after moving the spacecraft for the launch (2 novel species). Among the 53 novel extremo tolerant strains, 22 were isolated under the alkaline condition (> pH 10; alkalotolerant), eight after heat-shock (80 °C; 15 min; heat-tolerant), seven grown at 4 °C (psychrotolerant), six at 25 °C (mesophile), five under anaerobic atmosphere, and five after exposing to UVC condition (254 nm; 1000 J/m2). All these cultivation conditions were already published [9].
Genome features and relatedness indices
The isolation source, conditions, and WGS assembly statistics of the 53 novel strains are presented in Supplementary Table S1. The draft genomes of the novel species generated using the Nanopore platform were constructed with high-quality sequences, with assembly quality ranging from the complete genome (n = 20) to 8 scaffolds, and many of the strains exhibited > 99% completeness. The similarities among the closely related species of the novel species based on marker genes (16S rRNA and gyrB), average nucleotide index (ANI), average amino acid index (AAI), and digital DNA:DNA Hybridization (dDDH) are given in Table 1. Moreover, ANI indices (< 95%) and dDDH values (< 70%) fell below the threshold levels of bacterial species identity, confirming that the examined Phoenix mission strains (n = 53) were novel species. The ANI index ranged from 79 to 94%, with most of the 53 novel strains having less than 90% of ANI similarity with the closest relatives. Since no set threshold values for AAI and bacterial genus discrimination exist, it could not be definitively determined whether any of these novel species belong to new genera.
Phylogenomic analysis
The phylogenomic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene, gyrB, and WGS was performed, and these novel organisms were placed in their respective phylogenetic trees to determine their precise taxonomic placement.
Members of Actinomycetota phylum showed varied ANI index similarities when compared to established species. The ANI index of Agrococcus phoenicis 1P02AA revealed a low similarity (79–86%) with already recognized Agrococcus species, with Agrococcus carbonis being the closest species at 86% ANI. However, based on the single-copy core genes, Agrococcus baldri was the closest species, with 85.63% ANI. Three strains from Arthrobacter phoenicis of the present study exhibited 100% similarity among themselves and were closely related to Arthrobacter oryzae, with 83% ANI. The species Curtobacterium phoenicis was closely related to Curtobacterium luteum, exhibiting an ANI similarity of 89%. The strains belonging to Georgenia phoenicis (1P01AC and 1P07AB) were 100% similar to each other and presented an ANI of 89% to the closest relative, Georgenia satyanarayanai. The species belonging to Microbacterium genus (M. canaveralium, M. jepli, M. phoenicis, and M. pratiae) presented ANI values ranging from 84 to 93% compared with their closest relatives.
Four novel species were identified as belonging to Pseudomonadota phylum. Noviherbaspirillum phoenicis were closely related to Noviherbaspirillum soli, exhibiting an ANI of 94%. The novel species Brevundimonas phoenicis comprising 18 strains, clustered together with 100% ANI and showed 93% ANI similarity with Brevundimonas diminuta. Similarly, the four strains of Pseudomonas phoenicis were grouped with 100% ANI and showed ~ 86% similarity with the closest species Pseudomonas cremoricolorata. The novel species Sphingomonas canaveralia was placed near Sphingomonas jatrophae with a 79% ANI, and Sphingomonas phoenicis was adjacent to Sphingomonas metalli with an 83% ANI.
Additionally, among the strains belonging to the Bacillota phylum, the Alkalihalobacillus and Shouchella genera were placed in the same phylogenomic tree due to their similarity. Alkalihalobacillus phoenicis 1P02AB was closest to Alkalihalobacillus alcalophilus with an ANI of 92%, while the strains of Shouchella phoenicis were similar among themselves and closest to Shouchella hunanensis with an ANI of 81%. The novel species Bacillus jepli, and B. kalamii were not closely related, with ANI value of 80%, and similar patterns were observed when compared with other strains of Bacillus genus (ANI ranging from 76 to 83%). Lysinibacillus canaveralius clustered with Lysinibacillus odysseyi, presenting an ANI of 84%, while Lysinibacillus phoenicis was closely related to Lysinibacillus fusiformis with an ANI of 85%. Two species of Neobacillus, N. canaveralius and N. phoenicis, were distant from each other, with an ANI of 79%. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that N. canaveralius is closer to N. niacini, with an ANI of 87%, while N. phoenicis is closer to N. bataviensis, with an ANI of 79%. The single species Oceanobacillus phoenicis presented a high ANI percentage with its closest relative, Oceanobacillus kimchi with ANI of 90%. The novel representatives of Paenibacillus, P. jepli and P. canaveralius, were closely related to P. daejeonensis (ANI 81%) and P. chitinolyticus (ANI 90%), respectively. Two strains of Peribacillus phoenicis clustered together with 100% ANI and showed 94% similarity to Peribacillus frigoritolerans, its closest relative. The species Robertmurraya phoenicis was similar to Robertmurraya massiliosenegalensis, with a 91% ANI.
To further validate the placement of the novel species within the bacterial tree of life, a phylogenetic tree was generated by comparing them with 4441 complete, non-anomalous representative genomes of bacteria (Supplementary Figure S3). The tree of life showed that these novel genomes are almost distributed across the entire spectrum, indicating that spacecraft assembly cleanrooms can harbor a wide range of bacterial diversity. Additionally, 17 phylogenetic trees were constructed at the genus level, with Fig. 1 representing non-spore-formers and Fig. 2 representing spore-formers.
Morphological characterization
To analyze the bacterial isolates in further detail, Gram staining was performed on each isolate. Of all the isolates, 77% were Gram-negative, while the rest (23%) were characterized as Gram-positive bacteria. For in-depth morphological characterization scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis was carried out for all the isolates characterized as novel species. Many of the bacterial cells exhibited round or rod-shaped morphologies, presenting either as single cells or in aggregation of multiple cells. The details of the microscopic characterization of each isolate are presented in Table 2, based on SEM images (Fig. 3) and Gram staining images (Supplementary Figure S4). The novel species etymologies are given in Table 2.
Phenotypic characterization
The phenotypic identification results obtained using the BioLog GenIII system (Supplementary Table S2), and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (MALDI) assay are presented in Table 2. Both assays, which depend on databases of known microorganisms (mostly clinical origin), were unable to accurately identify the novel species. In the BioLog system, only 11 out of 26 novel species were identified to the genus level (Supplementary Table S2), while the MALDI profile could assign only 4 out of 26 species to their genera and none were identified at the species. The majority of species were classified as “no identification,” highlighting the limitations of phenotype-based methods for identifying novel species. This further emphasizes the importance of WGS-based phylogeny, which provides greater accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability in microbial classification. Additionally, the novel species identified in this study have been deposited in two culture collections, with their respective accession numbers listed in Table 2.
Persistence of novel species
Quality-filtered shotgun metagenomic reads were mapped onto 26 isolated novel species to assess their abundance based on the fraction of mapped reads and coverage breadth. Non-spore-formers had significantly more reads than spore-formers (Fig. 4A). Due to the limited proportion of mapped reads to novel species (< 1%), a read assembly was conducted to assess coverage breadth against isolated genomes. The average coverage breadth ranged from 0.0007 to 64.4% in JPL-SAF during 2016, from 0.00045 to 3.93% in JPL-SAF during 2018, and from 0.0004 to 6.8% in KSC-PHSF during 2018 (Supplementary Table S3). Using a 1% cutoff, the distribution of coverage breadth for novel species showing > 1% coverage (n = 23 species) in at least one sample is plotted in Fig. 4B. B. phoenicis demonstrated the highest mapping percentage, an anomaly, comprising 64.4% of total reads in a sample from location 9 in JPL-SAF. Additionally, M. jepli and G. phoenicis were present in more samples (n = 108) with > 1% coverage, followed by P. phoenicis (n = 105) and A. phoenicis (n = 104). Furthermore, three novel species (A. phoenicis, O. phoenicis, and P. jepli) were < 1% in their abundance in any of the samples and are not shown in Fig. 4B. This indicates that none of these 26 novel species dominate the cleanrooms and might be rare.
Metagenomic read mapping to novel isolates from NASA cleanrooms, highlighting temporal and spatial dynamics. A Spatial distribution of mapped reads across 26 novel species, showing distinct signatures between spore-forming and non-spore-forming bacteria in different NASA cleanroom locations. B Box plots illustrating the breadth of coverage (> 1%) of consensus genomes constructed from mapped reads aligned to 23 novel species (out of 26). Reads were collected from cleanrooms at SAF JPL and KSC-PHSF in 2016 (red) and KSC-PHSF in 2018 (blue)
The methodologies employed in this study to retrieve MAGs previously yielded 42 MAGs from International Space Station (ISS) environmental samples, which are copiotrophic and primarily composed of human-associated known species [17,18,19] as well as novel, yet-to-be-described environmental species [20]. However, no MAGs were recovered from any of the cleanroom samples (> 500 samples) including 164 samples analyzed in this study via shotgun metagenomics, emphasizing the extreme oligotrophic nature of cleanroom environments and the challenges associated with metagenomic assembly in such low-biomass conditions.
Functional characterization
Putative functions of the 26 novel bacterial species were annotated using Prokka and COG-classifier. A total of 212,520 CDS with 3807 distinct COG annotations were identified (Supplementary Table S4). Among the annotated subsystems, the top categories based on average gene counts included amino acids transport and metabolisms (259 genes), followed by transcription (232 genes), translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (229 genes), and carbohydrate transport and metabolism (225 genes). Further analysis of these organisms from the Phoenix spacecraft mission revealed that, on average, they possessed 74 genes predicted for defense mechanisms, primarily related to resistance to antibiotics and toxic compounds, and invasion and intracellular resistance.
Key genes potentially related to radiation resistance were observed across different bacterial isolates (Fig. 5A). The COG3253 proteins that were responsible for enhanced membrane transport and signaling under radiation were present in all spore-formers (n = 13) and eight novel actinobacterial species during this study. COG0608 genes, highlighting their role in DNA repair, were absent in all eight actinobacterial species but present in 18 other novel species. COG1108 genes, related to transcription regulation under radiation stress, were present in all novel species except alpha- and beta-proteobacteria (n = 24). COG1971 proteins involved in DNA repair after radiation exposure were found in all 13 spore-formers and five out of 13 non-spore-forming novel species. COG2318 proteins, associated with DNA repair and stress responses, were identified in spore-formers and A. phoenicis. COG4365 genes, responsible for increased radiation resistance, were present in all spore-formers but absent in other novel species. The involvement of COG4119 proteins in nucleotide excision repair pathways was reported in Bacillus subtilis, and in this investigation, this protein was present only in N. canaveralius whereas 12 other novel spore-formers lacked it.
Functional insights into novel species from NASA cleanrooms. A Presence of radiation resistance COGs (from Pal et al. [21]) in the 26 novel species, revealing their genetic potential for radiation resilience. B Presence of biofilm-associated COGs in the novel bacterial species. C. Presence of antimicrobial-resistance genes and similarity with the drug class
The KMAP approach was used to recover the dataset of proteins of interest (POIs) from the novel species (Supplementary Figure S4A). While exploring the metabolic potential of these novel species, various noteworthy observations were made, including the annotation of several hundred proteins in different application categories. Notably, higher numbers of proteins related to bioprocess engineering, medicine and pharmaceuticals, and analytics were observed, particularly those involved in synthesis, drug development, agriculture, the food industry, and molecular biology. POIs relevant to withstanding extremophilic conditions (such as high temperature and alkalinity) were also identified.
Biofilm formation
The biofilm-associated COG proteins observed across various bacterial isolates are depicted in Fig. 5B. The DNA-binding global transcriptional regulator BolA, which affects cell shape, cell division, and biofilm formation (COG0271), was identified exclusively in proteobacterial members (5 species; 25 strains). Like BolA, the colicin V production accessory protein CvpA, a regulator of purF expression and biofilm formation (COG1286), was also present in proteobacterial members but absent in non-spore-forming species. Conversely, all novel spore-formers (12 species; 14 strains) except Pa. jepli contained COG1286. The membrane protein YqgA (COG1811), associated with biofilm formation, was found in most spore-forming members but was absent in both Paenibacillus species and all non-spore-forming members during this study. Membrane-bound acyltransferase YfiQ (COG3936), involved in biofilm formation and previously found in Yersinia pestis, was present only in L. phoenicis and not in any other 25 novel species identified in this research. A group of functionally related cell fate molecular regulators that controlled sporulation, competence, and biofilm development processes and events through modulation of gene and protein expression, such as COG1774 (YaaT); COG3679 (YlbF, YheA/YmcA); and COG4550 (YmcA, YheA/YmcA), was detected in all spore-formers but was absent in non-spore-forming species during this study.
Antimicrobial resistance
Several AMR gene families were identified across the genomes, indicating resistance to ten distinct drug classes, with a predominance for fluoroquinolones, tetracyclines, disinfecting agents/antiseptics, phosphonic acids, and glycopeptides (Fig. 5C). The 53 genomes exhibited potential resistance to vancomycin and tetracycline antibiotics (Supplementary Table S5). The species B. canaveralius, B. jepli, B. phoenicis, L. phoenicis, L. canaveralius, P. canaveralius, P. jepli, R. phoenicis, N. canaveralius, and both strains of Pe. phoenicis (IP06PA-2 and 1P06PB) presented a higher amount of resistance genes. In terms of antibiotic resistance, five mechanisms were identified: the most common was antibiotic efflux, followed by antibiotic target alteration, antibiotic inactivation, and less commonly, antibiotic target protection and antibiotic target replacement. Overall, the genomic mining predicted the presence of 21 AMR genes, however, phenotypic investigation is necessary to validate the mechanisms.
Biosynthetic gene clusters
In this study, we detected 138 distinct gene clusters that did not share any similarities to the Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene Cluster (MIBiG) database [22]. We identified 14 gene clusters with 100% resemblance to existing clusters, including alkylresorcinol, bacillibactin, bacillopaline, carotenoid, ε-poly-L-lysine, and zeaxanthin (Supplementary Table S6). However, several partial biosynthetic gene clusters (BGC) were also found. We detected 19, 34, and 68 partial clusters with > 50%, > 25%, and < 25% similarity to known MIBiG clusters.
A BCG analysis revealed 11 cluster types across 26 novel species, with T3PKS and terpene clusters being the most abundant (Supplementary Figure S4B). P. jepli 1P07SE and S. phoenicis 1P01AA exhibited the highest number of BGCs, with 12 and 10 BGCs each, respectively. BGCs from isolates showing > 80% similarity with known gene clusters, including alkylresorcinol, carotenoid, ε-poly-L-lysine, and paeninodin, were observed in 17 isolates (Supplementary Table S6). The ε-poly-L-lysine, known for its wide-spectrum inhibitory activity, heat stability, and biodegradability as a food preservative, was identified in three species (A. phoenicis, M. canaveralium, M. jepli) with 100% similarity. A gene cluster neighborhood comparison of ε-poly-L-lysine with known producers revealed functional ε-poly-L-lysine synthetase genes. Protein sequence comparison showed 48% identity with the fungal producer Epichloe festucae and around 67% identity with the bacterial producer Corynebacterium variabile, with the highest 70.8% identity in M. canaveralium (Fig. 6). Domain analysis indicated conserved non-ribosomal peptide synthetases adenylation (A) and thiolation (T) domains, six transmembrane (TM) domains, and three C-terminal tandem domains, crucial for substrate binding and lysine polymerization. This suggests potential for producing ε-poly-L-lysine, effective against foodborne pathogens like E. coli O157:H7, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, and Serratia marcescens.
Comparative analysis of ε-poly-L-lysine synthetase (epls) in novel species. A ε-poly-L-lysine gene cluster comparison in Epichloe festucae (fungal producer), Corynebacterium variabile (bacterial producer), and three novel species from this study (Agrococcus phoenicis, Microbacterium canaveralium, Microbacterium jepli) and Leifsonia virtsii (isolated from ISS) show conserved gene cluster architecture. B Protein sequence alignment of ε-poly-L-lysine synthetase enzymes from these organisms exhibits conserved domains, including NRPS adenylation (A), thiolation (T), transmembrane (TM), and C-terminal tandem domains (C1, C2, C3)
Discussion
Several factors contributed to the higher percentage of novel cultivable species (~ 25%; 53 out of 215 strains) retrieved from cleanrooms compared to 6 to 12% in natural environments [23, 24]. Studies demonstrated that extreme and controlled environments (low number of particles and stringent decontamination processes) might select unique microbial communities capable of thriving under harsh conditions (low-nutrient, desiccation, exposure to residual disinfectants, etc.). This eliminates many transient, dominant microbes while favoring those with high resistance to stressors and potentially driving microbial speciation and adaptation [25,26,27,28,29]. This process does not inherently generate novel species but creates conditions where rare, stress-tolerant microorganisms can persist, survive long-term, and become more detectable through cultivation. In cleanrooms, for instance, traditionally spore-formers are often reported. However, non-spore-formers such as Arthrobacter, Brevundimonas, Georgenia, Microbacterium, and Pseudomonas species, which can survive in oligotrophic, arid, and radiation conditions [30,31,32,33,34], should also be considered when setting bioburden requirements for future NASA missions. Additionally, the isolation of spore-formers like Peribacillus and Shouchella species, which require different cultural conditions compared to Bacillus species, underscores the importance of WGS in characterizing yet-to-be-recognized cultivable microbial species [35, 36]. Research on microbial isolates from the Atacama Desert further supported the notion that oligotrophic conditions and unique environmental pressures led to the discovery of more novel microbial taxa [37, 38]. The comprehensive genome analysis of the novel species revealed the presence of already established/peer-reviewed genetic adaptations that enable bacteria to survive extreme conditions, including genes responsible for resistance to radiation, desiccation, and other environmental stressors.
Experimental studies on HemQ (COG3253), also known as coproheme decarboxylase/chlorite dismutase, have demonstrated its significant role in coenzyme transport and metabolism, as well as inorganic ion transport and metabolism. In gram-positive bacteria (Bacillota and Actinomycetota) HemQ plays an essential role and has been associated with respiration, detoxification of reactive oxygen (ROS) and nitrogen species, gas sensing, and transport [39], a crucial property for stress survivability. This linkage (COG3253) was observed in all spore-formers (n = 13) and eight novel actinobacterial species in this study. Knockout experiments of COG0608 genes resulted in increased radiation sensitivity, demonstrating their role in DNA repair [40]. These genes were absent in all eight actinobacterial species found in this study but present in 18 other novel species. Except in alpha- and beta-proteobacteria, all other novel species (n = 24) exhibited COG1108 genes, which are related to transcription regulation under radiation stress, potentially confirming their protective role [41]. All 13 spore-formers and five out of 13 non-spore-forming novel species exhibited the presence of COG1971 proteins involved in DNA repair after radiation exposure, as reported to be upregulated in D. radiodurans [42]. Spore-formers and A. phoenicis had COG2318 proteins, which were experimentally proved to respond to radiation using a transcriptomic study in D. radiodurans, indicating potential roles in DNA repair and stress responses. All spore-formers, but not other novel species, exhibited the presence of COG4365 genes that were shown to be responsible for increased radiation resistance, confirming their potential role in DNA repair [43]. Radiation exposure studies in B. subtilis confirmed the involvement of COG4119 proteins in nucleotide excision repair pathways [44]. However, the absence of COG4119 proteins in 12 out of 13 spore-forming novel species in this study requires further investigation. Despite rigorous decontamination procedures, microbes possessing these traits likely contribute to their persistence in cleanroom environments.
The metagenome analysis, which aimed to correlate the persistence of novel microbes within the assembly facility after more than a decade of their isolation, revealed that these novel bacterial species were rare microbial species due to their low incidence in shotgun metagenomes and the overall breadth of coverage for their genomes. The genomes identified in this study have not been previously reported, and their low abundance in cleanroom metagenomes suggests they are rare members of these environments. It is hypothesized that their presence in cleanrooms is due to selective pressures that favor extremotolerant microbes, but their occurrence in other oligotrophic environments cannot be ruled out. Given the computational constraints of screening all publicly available metagenomes, our analysis was limited to datasets from the environments where these strains were originally isolated. Expanding such analyses to other low-nutrient, high-stress habitats could provide further insights into their ecological distribution and potential ubiquity in extreme environments. Although individually rare, members of these novel bacterial communities collectively might have played crucial roles in ecosystem functioning and stability, including nutrient cycling, decomposition, and symbiotic interactions, potentially leading to the discovery of novel bioactive compounds, enzymes, and metabolic pathways [45,46,47].
Insights into the survival strategies of these extremotolerant bacteria, thriving under the unique conditions of cleanrooms, were gathered through comprehensive genomic analyses. Genes responsible for the synthesis of compounds such as unknown NAGGN, extensively found in the novel strains, aided the bacteria in facing osmotic stress. The synthesis of NAGGN was induced to enhance bacterial colonization in various ecological niches [48]. This functional property, along with other traits like the presence of genes encoding proteins involved in stress response and adaptation, such as heat shock proteins, cold shock proteins, and chaperones, facilitated survival under harsh cleanroom conditions. This is of particular interest for future NASA missions, where understanding microbial resilience is crucial [49, 50].
To further explore the metabolic potential of the novel species, genes associated with key dissimilatory pathways, particularly those involved in sulfur and nitrogen reduction and dissimilation, were analyzed. The presence of NirB (NADH-dependent nitrite reductase) and NarK (nitrate/nitrite transporter) were identified in multiple species, suggesting potential for nitrite reduction and nitrate/nitrite transport. Our study revealed key genes involved in dissimilatory nitrate reduction-NrfA (cytochrome c nitrite reductase)—present in Neobacillus phoenicis 1P10SD and Neobacillus canaveralius 3P2-tot-E-2, which is known to be associated with the dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA) pathway [51]. Notably, a higher presence of these genes was detected in Georgenia phoenicis (1P01AC, 1P07AB) and Neobacillus canaveralius (3P2-tot-E-2), suggesting a more extensive genetic potential for dissimilatory nitrate reduction. These findings indicate that alternative nitrogen-based electron acceptors may be utilized by certain novel species, providing a potential survival advantage in the oligotrophic conditions of cleanrooms. A complete overview of gene presence-absence across the analyzed genomes is provided in Supplementary Table S7.
Biofilms are associated with antibiotic resistance, likely due to their organization, which protects bacteria in the inner layers from antimicrobial agents and promotes horizontal gene transfer of resistance genes [52,53,54]. BolA (COG0271) noticed in proteobacterial members of this study was shown to be highly expressed in bacteria during the stationary phase and under stress conditions, suggesting its role in biofilm formation [55]. Overexpression of BolA in E. coli which promoted biofilm formation, while its absence produced thinner biofilms was reported [56]. Stress conditions such as nutrient depletion or oxidative stress resulted in significantly lower biofilm production in BolA mutants compared to the wild-type strain. Brevundimonas species during this study also possessed BolA that was reported to be forming biofilms with higher concentrations of antibiotic-resistant bacteria under disinfection pressure from chlorination and chloramination, increasing antibiotic resistance in tap water [57]. The membrane protein YqgA (COG1811) that was found to affect biofilm formation in E. coli [58] was also retrieved in the majority of the spore-formers during this study. In Y. pestis, biofilm formation increased significantly in cobB and yfiQ (COG3936) mutants, suggesting that they were the key players in biofilm formation. The cell fate regulators YmcA, YlbF, and YaaT (COG1744, COG3679, COG4550) were required for sporulation, competence, and biofilm formation [59]. Multiple transcriptional regulators were involved in complex cell differentiation in actinobacteria, cyanobacteria, and sporulating bacillota [60]. Genetic screens for mutants blocked in biofilm formation revealed that ylbF and ymcA genes played crucial roles, with YlbF and YmcA forming a complex with YaaT. Mutants lacking YaaT also showed impaired biofilm formation, competence, and sporulation [59, 61, 62].
A. phoenicis, M. canaveralium, and M. jepli genomes had BGCs related to potential production of ε-poly-L-lysine which is a versatile biopolymer with significant potential across various industries due to its strong antimicrobial activity and biodegradability. Its applications range from food preservation to biomedical and industrial uses, making it a valuable compound in enhancing product safety and longevity [63]. Both Sphingomonas species (n = 2) possess BGCs related to zeaxanthin, a carotenoid produced by other sphingomonads, which is significant for its strong antioxidant properties, protecting cells from oxidative stress [64]. It plays a crucial role in photoprotection by absorbing blue light and preventing damage from UV radiation. In biotechnology, zeaxanthin is valued for its potential health benefits, including eye health, reducing the risk of age-related macular degeneration, and other chronic diseases.
P. canaveralius showed BGCs related to the production of bacillibactin, which is a siderophore produced by certain Bacillus species [65]. Siderophores are small, high-affinity iron-chelating compounds that microorganisms synthesize and secrete to sequester iron from the environment, which is vital for their growth and metabolism, especially under iron-limiting conditions. P. jepli contains BGCs related to producing bacillopaline, which is often used in agriculture as a biocontrol agent and biofertilizer. Bacillopaline’s antimicrobial properties can protect plants from pathogenic microorganisms, thus promoting healthier plant growth. By inhibiting plant pathogens, bacillopaline-producing bacterial strains can reduce the reliance on chemical pesticides, offering a more sustainable and environmentally friendly approach to agriculture [66].
All four strains of Ps. phoenicis exhibited BGCs related to carotenoids, which are reported to serve as powerful antioxidants and photoprotective agents, protecting cells from oxidative damage and UV radiation. They also enhance bacterial survival by aiding quorum sensing and biofilm formation, with significant applications in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food additives [67]. Similarly, both genomes of G. phoenicis contain BGCs related to alkylresorcinols, which are bioactive compounds known for their antimicrobial, antifungal, and anticancer properties [68]. They play a role in bacterial defense mechanisms and biofilm formation. Additionally, alkylresorcinols are used in pharmaceuticals for their therapeutic potential and in the food industry as natural preservatives due to their inhibitory effects on spoilage organisms. BGCs related to the potential production of paeninodin were found in both strains of Pe. phoenicis. Paeninodin is a cyclic lipopeptide produced by Paenibacillus species and exhibits significant antimicrobial properties, particularly against Gram-positive bacteria. This compound is noted for its potential in agricultural biocontrol, offering an environmentally friendly alternative to chemical pesticides. Furthermore, surfactant properties of paeninodin make it valuable in industrial applications, such as in the formulation of biosurfactants for bioremediation processes [69].
Using KMAP analysis, several biotechnological applications were predicted in the novel strains. Notably, genes encoding enzymes like polymerases and cellulases, which are relevant for survival in high temperature and alkalinity conditions, were observed. These extremozymes have significant industrial applications due to their stability and efficiency under extreme conditions, making them valuable for processes such as PCR and bioremediation [70, 71]. Further exploration of these POIs from extremotolerant organisms could enhance current industrial processes by comparing them with the best enzymes available, potentially leading to more efficient and robust biotechnological solutions [72].
Culturing methods may introduce biases, favoring certain microbial types over others [73, 74]. However, WGS of novel cultivated species can contribute to metagenome sequence approaches. While comprehensive, technology development is needed for metagenomic analysis to include rare and low-abundant species or those with highly divergent genomes [75]. Future research should focus on further characterizing the functional properties of these novel species, exploring their applications in various industries, and developing improved contamination control strategies.
Conclusion
The controlled conditions and stringent decontamination processes in cleanrooms create unique selective pressures that foster the survival of rare, stress-resistant microorganisms, leading to the isolation of novel species with significant biotechnological potential. Unlike transient, abundant microbes introduced by human activity, these persistent species endure extreme stressors such as radiation, desiccation, and nutrient limitation, making them highly relevant for NASA’s planetary protection and microbial risk assessments. Cultivating and sequencing these microbes reveals survival mechanisms that metagenomic approaches alone often overlook, providing critical insights into contamination control, space habitat safety, and biotechnological applications. This research directly informs NASA’s forward contamination mitigation strategies, while also benefiting the medical, pharmaceutical, and industrial sectors by identifying microbes relevant to infection control, biocontainment, and antimicrobial resistance. Understanding how rare microbes thrive in extreme environments has profound implications for biotechnology, astrobiology, and human health, particularly in resource-limited settings such as spacecraft and medical cleanrooms.
Material and methods
Samples were taken from the KSC-PHSF at three distinct times: first before the Phoenix spacecraft arrival on April 25, 2007 (1P), next during the spacecraft’s assembly and testing before its launch on June 27, 2007 (2P), and finally after the spacecraft had been moved to the launch pad on August 1, 2007 (3P). Sample collection and isolation of bacterial strains (n = 215 strains) cultured under different extreme conditions were already published [10]. The details of all 53 isolates belonging to novel species, including their isolation locations and conditions, are provided in Supplementary Table S1. Information on culture conditions of seven plate assays and three molecular analyses were already published [5, 10]. Prior to DNA extraction, the isolates were stored at –80 °C in 20% glycerol stock in the JPL microbial collection, ensuring long-term viability and preservation. Additionally, 26 novel species identified in this study were deposited in two recognized culture collections—DSMZ and MTCC—and their respective accession numbers are included in Table 2.
Controls
Appropriate experimental controls were implemented throughout the study. Sterile water samples served as negative controls for all culture-based assays, while negative controls were included at each procedural step for molecular analyses. Indigenous DNA from sampling materials was analyzed alongside experimental samples. For example, a sterile BiSKit, pre-moistened and exposed to PHSF air for 3–5 min was used as a field control. These field and negative controls underwent the same DNA extraction protocols as surface samples.
For DNA extraction and PCR amplification, controls included blanks (buffer), a DNA-free template (sterile molecular-grade water), and DNA extraction reagents. Purified DNA from Bacillus pumilus SAFR-032 served as a positive control. Samples lacking expected PCR products in metagenomic library protocols were spiked with 1 ng of B. pumilus DNA to assess potential PCR inhibitors. Metagenomic libraries were generated for the blanks, subjected to NGS sequencing, and the resulting sequences were deposited in the NCBI SRA database. Details can be obtained from NCBI Project accessions PRJNA1150505 and PRJNA641079.
Shotgun metagenome sequencing analysis produced minimal reads from the negative controls, while culture-based methods did not yield microbial colonies despite testing various culture conditions. However, all 215 isolates characterized in this study were successfully recovered from one of the seven culture conditions employed [10], but only when experimental samples were analyzed. No microbial colonies were observed in the negative control samples, confirming the absence of contamination and the reliability of the cultivation process.
DNA extraction and whole-genome sequencing
For WGS, genomic DNA was extracted using the ZymoBIOMICS DNA MagBead kit. The DNA of 215 strains (Supplementary Figure S1) was assessed for quality, normalized to 50 ng for library preparation, and barcoded with an Oxford Nanopore Technology transposase barcoding kit (SQK-RBK114.96, Oxford Nanopore, Oxford, UK). Finally, each pool of libraries was loaded onto a PromethION flowcell (FLO-PRO114M, R10.4.1) for long-read sequencing.
Genome assembly and relatedness indices
Quality checks of the raw reads were conducted using FastQC v.0.12.0 [76], followed by Unicycler v.0.5.0 [77], Flye v.2.9.1 [78], and Canu v.2.2 [79] on the filtered reads for de novo assembly of the genome. To identify the optimal representative assembly from each genome group, genomes within each group were de-replicated using dRep v. 3.4.5 [80]. Subsequently, each assembly was assessed for completeness and contamination by CheckM v.1.2.2 [81].
To facilitate nucleotide-level comparisons of the genomes within their respective genera, the NCBI command line tool datasets v.15.23.0 was employed to obtain all validly described representative genomes of these 18 genera (https://github.com/ncbi/datasets). Then, pairwise ANI was computed using FastANI v.1.34 with the novel strains as a query with representative genomes [82]. Furthermore, for estimating dDDH, the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator v.3.0 online tool was used with recommended Formula 2 utilizing the BLAST + alignment tool [83]. In addition, AAI values were computed using aai.rb function from the Enveomics collection toolbox, and the sequence identity for conserved protein gyrB was calculated using Blast v.2.13.0, respectively.
WGS-based phylogeny
For the Actinomycetota group (n = 11 strains), a set of 138 single-copy genes (SCGs) and Bacillota group, 119 SCGs (n = 15 strains) were utilized to construct phylogenetic trees at the genus level employing GToTree v.1.8.2 [84]. For Pseudomonadota group (n = 27 strains), a class level phylogenetic tree was generated using 117 SCGs for Alphaproteobacteria, 172 SCGs belonging to Gammaproteobacteria, and 203 SCGs of Betaproteobacteria. An appropriate outgroup was selected for each tree construction.
Subsequently, IQTREE v.2.2.0.3 [85] was employed with ModelFinder-Plus [86] to construct the phylogenetic tree from the protein alignment generated by GToTree with 1,000 ultrafast bootstrap replicates. Additionally, aiming to place the novel strains in the bacterial tree of life, 4441 complete, non-anomalous representative genomes of bacteria were retrieved from the NCBI Reference Sequence (RefSeq) database. Subsequently, a phylogenetic tree using the 16 SCG-set as previously described by Hug et al. [87] was constructed. All trees were then annotated and visualized using the interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v.6.7 [88].
Microscopic and phenotypic characterizations
Each bacterial strain was cultured on TSA medium incubated at 26 °C for up to 48 h before proceeding for Gram staining [89]. For SEM imaging analysis, the bacterial samples were loaded on silicon wafers and fixed in 4% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for 2 h at room temperature, followed by 3 washes of 5 min with 0.1 M phosphate buffer. The samples were then dehydrated in ascending isopropanol (IPA) and water series (25%, 30%, 50%, 70%, 80%, 90%, 95%, and 100%) each for 10 min, followed by the final 3 times rinsing in 100% IPA and then were critically point dried in EM CPD300 (Leica Company, Wetzlar, Germany). Finally, the silicon wafers carrying the bacterial samples were mounted on SEM stubs (Ted Pella Inc.) using carbon tape and coated with 2 nm of iridium using a sputter coater (Q300T T Plus; Electron Microscopy Sciences Company, Hartfield, PA, USA). The SEM images were collected on Quattro ESEM (ThermoFisher Company, Waltham, MA, USA).
The BioLog GenIII system was used as established by Wragg et al. [15] to generate phenotypic characteristics and MALDI profiles were generated according to the Bielen et al. protocol [16].
Estimating the abundance of novel species in the cleanroom metagenomes
In order to investigate the presence of newly identified species within controlled cleanroom environments of NASA, 164 metagenome samples were analyzed. They were obtained from Mars 2020 mission assembly cleanrooms: 140 samples from the Spacecraft Assembly Facility (SAF) at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL), California, and 24 samples from the Payload Hazardous Servicing Facility (PHSF) at the Kennedy Space Center (KSC), Florida. Detailed information about the samples can be found in Supplementary Table S3. The samples treated with propidium monoazide (PMA) were considered for this study to capture only viable and intact cells. Initially, the samples were subjected to quality filtering using fastp v.0.22.0 with a phred-score cut-off of 15 and polyG tails trimming with a minimum length of 10 [90] to eliminate low-quality reads. Then, Bowtie2 v.1.2.2 within MetaCompass v.2.0 were utilized to align the filtered reads to newly identified genomes and determine their abundance in the NASA cleanrooms based on mapped reads. Following this, MEGAHIT v.1.0.6 within MetaCompass was used to assemble the mapped reads and generate consensus sequences [90]. The percentage of reads aligned to these novel species was quantified, and assessed the breadth of coverage of the consensus sequences in each sample.
Genome characterization and screening of secondary-metabolite biosynthetic potential
Open reading frames (ORFs) in the 53 novel strains were identified by using the command-line tool Prokka v.1.14.5, which employs Prodigal for gene annotation based on multiple reference databases [91]. For functional profiling, Python-based tool cogclassifier v.1.0.5 (https://pypi.org/project/cogclassifier/) was utilized to retrieve Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COGs) from the annotated genomes. To detect antibiotic resistance genes and markers, the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) v.6.0.3 was used, leveraging the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD) v.3.2.6 [92]. Only “Perfect” and “Strict” matches were considered to ensure high confidence in the identified antibiotic-resistance genes. All genomes were also annotated using the KAUST Metagenomic Analyses Platform (KMAP) [93], which captures Proteins of Industrial Interest (POIs) based on a comprehensive dictionary of genes relevant to industries such as bioprocess engineering, medicine, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and detergents.
Secondary metabolite biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) were identified in each novel genome using antiSMASH v.7.0.0 [94] with a “Relaxed” detection setting, and the identified BGCs were curated for functional annotation using MIBiG v.3.1 [22]. The study focused on one particular BGC, ε-Poly-L-lysine, present in three of the isolates with 100% similarity score. The gene neighborhood across this cluster was visualized using Clinker on the CAGECAT web server (https://cagecat.bioinformatics.nl/tools/clinker), comparing it with the known producers Epichloe festucae and Corynebacterium variabile. Additionally, the protein sequence of ε-Poly-L-lysine synthetase was aligned using the Clustal Omega web server (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/jdispatcher/msa/clustalo) and visualized the conserved regions in different domains using the NCBI Multiple Sequence Alignment Viewer v.1.25.0.
Data availability
The draft genome sequences of all the 53 novel strains characterized in this study were deposited in NCBI under BioProject PRJNA1048065. The shotgun metagenome reads are available under BioProject PRJNA1150505 and PRJNA641079. The NCBI accession numbers for the 16S rRNA and WGS are given in Table 1, and the genome versions described in this paper are the first versions. The codes used in this study are available at https://github.com/RamanLab/phoenix-novel-species/wiki. The 26 novel species described in this study were deposited in two recognized culture collections—DSMZ and MTCC—and their respective accession numbers are available in Table 2.
References
Lax S, Smith DP, Hampton-Marcell J, Owens SM, Handley KM, Scott NM, et al. Longitudinal analysis of microbial interaction between humans and the indoor environment. Science. 2014;345(6200):1048–52. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/science.1254529.
Mora M, Mahnert A, Koskinen K, Pausan MR, Oberauner-Wappis L, Krause R, et al. Microorganisms in confined habitats: microbial monitoring and control of intensive care units, operating rooms, cleanrooms and the international space station. Front Microbiol. 2016;7(1573). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01573.
Miliotis G, Sengupta P, Hameed A, Chuvochina M, McDonagh F, Simpson AC, et al. Novel spore-forming species exhibiting intrinsic resistance to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins and description of Tigheibacillus jepli gen. nov., sp. nov. mBio. 2024;15(4):e00181-24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/mbio.00181-24.
Checinska Sielaff A, Urbaniak C, Mohan GBM, Stepanov VG, Tran Q, Wood JM, et al. Characterization of the total and viable bacterial and fungal communities associated with the international space station surfaces. Microbiome. 2019;7(1):50. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-019-0666-x.
La Duc MT, Dekas A, Osman S, Moissl C, Newcombe D, Venkateswaran K. Isolation and characterization of bacteria capable of tolerating the extreme conditions of clean room environments. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(8):2600–11. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/aem.03007-06.
NASA: planetary protection provisions for robotic extraterrestrial missions. NPR 8020.12D, April 2011. In. Washington, D.C.: National Aeronautics and Space Administration; 2011.
La Duc MT, Kern RG, Venkateswaran K. Microbial monitoring of spacecraft and associated environments. Microb Ecol. 2004;47:150–8.
La Duc MT, Nicholson W, Kern R, Venkateswaran K. Microbial characterization of the Mars Odyssey spacecraft and its encapsulation facility. Environ Microbiol. 2003;5(10):977–85.
Chander AM, Teixeira MdM, Singh NK, Williams MP, Simpson AC, Damle N, et al. Description and genome characterization of three novel fungal strains isolated from mars 2020 mission-associated spacecraft assembly facility: recommendations for two new genera and one species. J Fungi. 2023;9(1):31.
Ghosh S, Osman S, Vaishampayan P, Venkateswaran K. Recurrent isolation of extremotolerant bacteria from the clean room where Phoenix spacecraft components were assembled. Astrobiology. 2010;10(3):325–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/ast.2009.0396.
Blachowicz A, Mhatre S, Singh NK, Wood JM, Parker CW, Ly C, et al. The isolation and characterization of rare mycobiome associated with spacecraft assembly cleanrooms. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:777133. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.777133.
Hendrickson R, Urbaniak C, Minich JJ, Aronson HS, Martino C, Stepanauskas R, et al. Clean room microbiome complexity impacts planetary protection bioburden. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):238. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-021-01159-x.
Link L, Sawyer J, Venkateswaran K, Nicholson W. Extreme spore UV resistance of Bacillus pumilus isolates obtained from an ultraclean spacecraft assembly facility. Microb Ecol. 2004;47:159–63.
Rummel JD. Planetary exploration in the time of astrobiology: protecting against biological contamination. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(5):2128–31.
Wragg P, Randall L, Whatmore AM. Comparison of Biolog GEN III MicroStation semi-automated bacterial identification system with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing for the identification of bacteria of veterinary interest. J Microbiol Methods. 2014;105:16–21. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.mimet.2014.07.003.
Bielen A, Babić I, Vuk Surjan M, Kazazić S, Šimatović A, Lajtner J, et al. Comparison of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry and 16S rDNA sequencing for identification of environmental bacteria: a case study of cave mussel-associated culturable microorganisms. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2024;31(14):21752–64. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s11356-024-32537-1.
Singh NK, Wood JM, Mhatre SS, Venkateswaran K. Metagenome to phenome approach enables isolation and genomics characterization of Kalamiella piersonii gen. nov., sp. nov. from the International Space Station. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(11):4483–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-019-09813-z.
Singh NK, Wood JM, Patane J, Moura LMS, Lombardino J, Setubal JC, et al. Characterization of metagenome-assembled genomes from the international space station. Microbiome. 2023;11(1):125. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-023-01545-7.
Singh NK, Wood JM, Mhatre SS, Venkateswaran K. Correction to: metagenome to phenome approach enables isolation and genomics characterization of Kalamiella piersonii gen. nov., sp. nov. from the International Space Station. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2019;103(16):6851–2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00253-019-10009-8.
Bijlani S, Singh NK, Eedara VVR, Podile AR, Mason CE, Wang CCC, et al. Methylobacterium ajmalii sp. nov., isolated from the international space station. Front Microbiology. 2021;12(534). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2021.639396.
Pal S, Yuvaraj R, Krishnan H, Venkatraman B, Abraham J, Gopinathan A. Unraveling radiation resistance strategies in two bacterial strains from the high background radiation area of Chavara-Neendakara: a comprehensive whole genome analysis. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0304810. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0304810.
Terlouw BR, Blin K, Navarro-Muñoz JC, Avalon NE, Chevrette MG, Egbert S, et al. MIBiG 3.0: a community-driven effort to annotate experimentally validated biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023;51(D1):D603-d10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkac1049.
Zhao X, Liu J, Zhou S, Zheng Y, Wu Y, Kogure K, et al. Diversity of culturable heterotrophic bacteria from the Mariana Trench and their ability to degrade macromolecules. Marine Life Sci Technol. 2020;2(2):181–93. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s42995-020-00027-1.
Sefrji FO, Marasco R, Michoud G, Seferji KA, Merlino G, Daffonchio D. Insights into the cultivable bacterial fraction of sediments from the red sea mangroves and physiological, chemotaxonomic, and genomic characterization of Mangrovibacillus cuniculi gen. nov., sp. nov., a Novel Member of the Bacillaceae Family. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:777986. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2022.777986.
Mahnert A, Vaishampayan P, Probst AJ, Auerbach A, Moissl-Eichinger C, Venkateswaran K, et al. Cleanroom maintenance significantly reduces abundance but not diversity of indoor microbiomes. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0134848. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pone.0134848.
Li SJ, Hua ZS, Huang LN, Li J, Shi SH, Chen LX, et al. Microbial communities evolve faster in extreme environments. Sci Rep. 2014;4:6205. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/srep06205.
Moissl C, Osman S, La Duc MT, Dekas A, Brodie E, DeSantis T, et al. Molecular bacterial community analysis of clean rooms where spacecraft are assembled. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007;61(3):509–21. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2007.00360.x.
Moissl-Eichinger C, Auerbach AK, Probst AJ, Mahnert A, Tom L, Piceno Y, et al. Quo vadis? Microbial profiling revealed strong effects of cleanroom maintenance and routes of contamination in indoor environments. Sci Rep. 2015;5:1–20.
Vaishampayan PA, Rabbow E, Horneck G, Venkateswaran KJ. Survival of Bacillus pumilus spores for a prolonged period of time in real space conditions. Astrobiology. 2012;12(5):487–97. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1089/ast.2011.0738.
Han XY, Andrade RA. Brevundimonas diminuta infections and its resistance to fluoroquinolones. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;55(6):853–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/jac/dki139.
Corretto E, Antonielli L, Sessitsch A, Höfer C, Puschenreiter M, Widhalm S, et al. Comparative genomics of Microbacterium species to reveal diversity, potential for secondary metabolites and heavy metal resistance. Front Microbiol. 2020;11; https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2020.01869.
Strong LC, Rosendahl C, Johnson G, Sadowsky MJ, Wackett LP. Arthrobacter aurescens TC1 metabolizes diverse s-triazine ring compounds. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68(12):5973–80. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/aem.68.12.5973-5980.2002.
da Silva AC, Rachid CTCdC, de Jesus HE, Rosado AS, Peixoto RS. Predicting the biotechnological potential of bacteria isolated from Antarctic soils, including the rhizosphere of vascular plants. Polar Biol. 2017;40(7):1393–407. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00300-016-2065-0.
Senchenkov VY, Lyakhovchenko NS, Nikishin IA, Myagkov DA, Chepurina AA, Polivtseva VN, et al. Whole-genome sequencing and biotechnological potential assessment of two bacterial strains isolated from poultry farms in Belgorod, Russia. Microorganisms. 2023;11(9). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/microorganisms11092235.
Patel S, Gupta RS. A phylogenomic and comparative genomic framework for resolving the polyphyly of the genus Bacillus: proposal for six new genera of Bacillus species, Peribacillus gen. nov., Cytobacillus gen. nov., Mesobacillus gen. nov., Neobacillus gen. nov., Metabacillus gen. nov. and Alkalihalobacillus gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70(1):406–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/ijsem.0.003775.
Kim KH, Han DM, Lee JK, Jeon CO. Alkalicoccobacillus porphyridii sp. nov., isolated from a marine red alga, reclassification of Shouchella plakortidis and Shouchella gibsonii as Alkalicoccobacillus plakortidis comb. nov. and Alkalicoccobacillus gibsonii comb. nov., and emended description of the genus Alkalicoccobacillus Joshi et al. 2022. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2023;73(8). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1099/ijsem.0.006019.
Paulino-Lima IG, Azua-Bustos A, Vicuña R, González-Silva C, Salas L, Teixeira L, et al. Isolation of UVC-tolerant bacteria from the hyperarid Atacama Desert. Chile Microb Ecol. 2013;65(2):325–35. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00248-012-0121-z.
Gaete A, Mandakovic D, González M. Isolation and identification of soil bacteria from extreme environments of Chile and their plant beneficial characteristics. Microorganisms. 2020;8(8):1213.
Aftab H, Donegan RK. Regulation of heme biosynthesis via the coproporphyrin dependent pathway in bacteria. Front Microbiol. 2024;15. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1345389.
Blasius M, Sommer S, Hübscher U. Deinococcus radiodurans: what belongs to the survival kit? Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 2008;43(3):221–38. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1080/10409230802122274.
Frenkiel-Krispin D, Sack R, Englander J, Shimoni E, Eisenstein M, Bullitt E, et al. Structure of the DNA-SspC complex: implications for DNA packaging, protection, and repair in bacterial spores. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(11):3525–30. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/jb.186.11.3525-3530.2004.
Liu Y, Zhou J, Omelchenko MV, Beliaev AS, Venkateswaran A, Stair J, et al. Transcriptome dynamics of Deinococcus radiodurans recovering from ionizing radiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(7):4191–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.0630387100.
Eisen JA, Hanawalt PC. A phylogenomic study of DNA repair genes, proteins, and processes. Mutat Res. 1999;435(3):171–213. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s0921-8777(99)00050-6.
Cortesao M, Fuchs FM, Commichau FM, Eichenberger P, Schuerger AC, Nicholson WL, et al. Bacillus subtilis spore resistance to simulated mars surface conditions. Front Microbiol. 2019;10:333. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2019.00333.
Simpson AC, Sengupta P, Zhang F, Hameed A, Parker CW, Singh NK, et al. Phylogenomics, phenotypic, and functional traits of five novel (Earth-derived) bacterial species isolated from the International Space Station and their prevalence in metagenomes. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):19207. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-023-44172-w.
Lam KN, Cheng J, Engel K, Neufeld JD, Charles TC. Current and future resources for functional metagenomics. Front Microbiol. 2015;6:1196. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01196.
Bikel S, Valdez-Lara A, Cornejo-Granados F, Rico K, Canizales-Quinteros S, Soberón X, et al. Combining metagenomics, metatranscriptomics and viromics to explore novel microbial interactions: towards a systems-level understanding of human microbiome. Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2015;13:390–401. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.csbj.2015.06.001.
Sagot B, Gaysinski M, Mehiri M, Guigonis JM, Le Rudulier D, Alloing G. Osmotically induced synthesis of the dipeptide N-acetylglutaminylglutamine amide is mediated by a new pathway conserved among bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(28):12652–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1073/pnas.1003063107.
Coker JA. Recent advances in understanding extremophiles. F1000Res. 2019;8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.12688/f1000research.20765.1.
Brock TD. The value of basic research: discovery of Thermus aquaticus and other extreme thermophiles. Genetics. 1997;146(4):1207–10. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/genetics/146.4.1207.
Hameed A, McDonagh F, Sengupta P, Miliotis G, Sivabalan SKM, Szydlowski L, et al. Neobacillus driksii sp. nov. isolated from a Mars 2020 spacecraft assembly facility and genomic potential for lasso peptide production in Neobacillus. Microbiol Spectr. 2025;13(1):e01376-24. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/spectrum.01376-24.
Uruén C, Chopo-Escuin G, Tommassen J, Mainar-Jaime RC, Arenas J. Biofilms as promoters of bacterial antibiotic resistance and tolerance. Antibiotics (Basel). 2020;10(1). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3390/antibiotics10010003.
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999;284(5418):1318–22. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1126/science.284.5418.1318.
Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2002;15(2):167–93. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/cmr.15.2.167-193.2002.
da Silva AA, Galego L, Arraiano CM. New perspectives on BolA: a still mysterious protein connecting morphogenesis, biofilm production, virulence, iron metabolism, and stress survival. Microorganisms. 2023;11(3):632.
Vieira HL, Freire P, Arraiano CM. Effect of Escherichia coli morphogene bolA on biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(9):5682–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/aem.70.9.5682-5684.2004.
Zhang J, Li W, Chen J, Wang F, Qi W, Li Y. Impact of disinfectant on bacterial antibiotic resistance transfer between biofilm and tap water in a simulated distribution network. Environ Pollut. 2019;246:131–40. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.11.077.
Kvist M, Hancock V, Klemm P. Inactivation of efflux pumps abolishes bacterial biofilm formation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74(23):7376–82. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/aem.01310-08.
Carabetta VJ, Tanner AW, Greco TM, Defrancesco M, Cristea IM, Dubnau D. A complex of YlbF, YmcA and YaaT regulates sporulation, competence and biofilm formation by accelerating the phosphorylation of Spo0A. Mol Microbiol. 2013;88(2):283–300. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1111/mmi.12186.
Tang S-K, Zhi X-Y, Zhang Y, Makarova KS, Liu B-B, Zheng G-S, et al. Cellular differentiation into hyphae and spores in halophilic archaea. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1827. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41467-023-37389-w.
Branda SS, González-Pastor JE, Dervyn E, Ehrlich SD, Losick R, Kolter R. Genes involved in formation of structured multicellular communities by Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(12):3970–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1128/jb.186.12.3970-3979.2004.
Kearns DB, Chu F, Branda SS, Kolter R, Losick R. A master regulator for biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis. Mol Microbiol. 2005;55:739–49.
Chen Y, Miao W, Li X, Xu Y, Gao H, Zheng B. The structure, properties, synthesis method and antimicrobial mechanism of ε-polylysine with the preservative effects for aquatic products. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2023;139:104131. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104131.
Breithaupt DE. Modern application of xanthophylls in animal feeding–a review. Trends Food Sci Technol. 2007;18(10):501–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.04.009.
Saha R, Saha N, Donofrio RS, Bestervelt LL. Microbial siderophores: a mini review. J Basic Microbiol. 2013;53(4):303–17. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1002/jobm.201100552.
Kloepper JW, Ryu CM, Zhang S. Induced systemic resistance and promotion of plant growth by Bacillus spp. Phytopathology. 2004;94(11):1259–66. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1094/phyto.2004.94.11.1259.
Stafsnes MH, Josefsen KD, Kildahl-Andersen G, Valla S, Ellingsen TE, Bruheim P. Isolation and characterization of marine pigmented bacteria from Norwegian coastal waters and screening for carotenoids with UVA-blue light absorbing properties. J Microbiol. 2010;48(1):16–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s12275-009-0118-6.
Zabolotneva AA, Shatova OP, Sadova AA, Shestopalov AV, Roumiantsev SA. An overview of alkylresorcinols biological properties and effects. J Nutr Metab. 2022;2022:4667607. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1155/2022/4667607.
Ongena M, Jacques P. Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol. Trends Microbiol. 2008;16(3):115–25. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009.
Hough DW, Danson MJ. Extremozymes. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 1999;3(1):39–46. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/s1367-5931(99)80008-8.
Elleuche S, Schröder C, Sahm K, Antranikian G. Extremozymes–biocatalysts with unique properties from extremophilic microorganisms. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;29:116–23. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1016/j.copbio.2014.04.003.
Burkhardt C, Baruth L, Neele M-H, Klippel B, Margaryan A, Paloyan A, et al. Mining thermophiles for biotechnologically relevant enzymes: evaluating the potential of European and Caucasian hot springs. Extremophiles. 2023;28(1):5. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s00792-023-01321-3.
Schultz J, Modolon F, Peixoto RS, Rosado AS. Shedding light on the composition of extreme microbial dark matter: alternative approaches for culturing extremophiles. Front Microbiol. 2023;14. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1167718.
Schultz J, dos Santos A, Patel N, Rosado AS. Life on the edge: bioprospecting extremophiles for astrobiology. J Indian Inst Sci. 2023;103(3):721–37. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/s41745-023-00382-9.
McLaren MR, Willis AD, Callahan BJ. Consistent and correctable bias in metagenomic sequencing experiments. eLife. 2019;8:e46923. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.7554/eLife.46923.
Andrews S: FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. 2010. Retrieved from http://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017;13(6):e1005595. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005595.
Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat biotechnol. 2019;37(5):540–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8.
Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM. Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):722–36. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gr.215087.116.
Olm MR, Brown CT, Brooks B, Banfield JF. dRep: a tool for fast and accurate genomic comparisons that enables improved genome recovery from metagenomes through de-replication. ISMEJ. 2017;11(12):2864–8. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/ismej.2017.126.
Parks DH, Imelfort M, Skennerton CT, Hugenholtz P, Tyson GW. CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 2015;25(7):1043–55. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1101/gr.186072.114.
Jain C, Rodriguez RL, Phillippy AM, Konstantinidis KT, Aluru S. High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5114. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9.
Meier-Kolthoff JP, Carbasse JS, Peinado-Olarte RL, Göker M. TYGS and LPSN: a database tandem for fast and reliable genome-based classification and nomenclature of prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;50(D1):D801–7. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkab902.
Lee MD. GToTree: a user-friendly workflow for phylogenomics. Bioinformatics. 2019;35(20):4162–4. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bioinformatics/btz188.
Minh BQ, Hahn MW, Lanfear R. New methods to calculate concordance factors for phylogenomic datasets. Mol Biol Evol. 2020;37(9):2727–33. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/molbev/msaa106.
Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TKF, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nat Methods. 2017;14(6):587–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nmeth.4285.
Hug LA, Baker BJ, Anantharaman K, Brown CT, Probst AJ, Castelle CJ, et al. A new view of the tree of life. Nat Microbiol. 2016;1(5):16048. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.48.
Letunic I, Bork P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: an online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(W1):W293–6. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkab301.
Claus D. A standardized Gram staining procedure. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1992;8(4):451–2. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1007/BF01198764.
Luan T, Cepeda V, Liu B, Bowen Z, Ayyangar U, Almeida M, et al. MetaCompass: reference-guided assembly of metagenomes. arXiv preprint arXiv:240301578. 2024.
Seemann T. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(14):2068–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153.
Alcock BP, Huynh W, Chalil R, Smith KW, Raphenya Amogelang R, Wlodarski MA, et al. CARD 2023: expanded curation, support for machine learning, and resistome prediction at the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2022;51(D1):D690–9. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkac920.
Alam I, Kamau AA, Ngugi DK, Gojobori T, Duarte CM, Bajic VB. KAUST Metagenomic analysis platform (KMAP), enabling access to massive analytics of re-annotated metagenomic data. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):11511. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1038/s41598-021-90799-y.
Blin K, Shaw S, Augustijn HE, Reitz ZL, Biermann F, Alanjary M, et al. antiSMASH 7.0: new and improved predictions for detection, regulation, chemical structures and visualisation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2023. https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1093/nar/gkad344.
Acknowledgements
We thank Michael Williams, a student intern from CalPoly-Pomona, for reviving and purifying the strains, and Zymo Research Corp. for extracting DNA. We would like to thank the staff from the Bioscience Core Lab, Supercomputing Core Lab, and Imaging and Characterization Core Lab from the King Abdullah University of Science and Technology for their excellent support in conducting the analyses. We thank Abhay Bhat for his support in metagenomics data analysis. P.S. is a recipient of the Prime Minister’s Research Fellowship (PMRF) from the Ministry of Education, Government of India. S.K.M.S. acknowledges the Half-Time Teaching Assistantship (HTTA) from the Ministry of Education, Government of India.
Disclaimer
This manuscript was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the NASA, an agency of the US Government. The US Government, NASA, California Institute of Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and their employees make no warranty, expressed or implied, or assumed any liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed in this manuscript, or represents that its use would not infringe upon privately held rights. The use of, and references to any commercial product, process, or service does not necessarily constitute or imply endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the US Government, NASA, California Institute of Technology, or Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Views and opinions presented herein by the authors of this manuscript do not necessarily reflect those of the US Government, NASA, California Institute of Technology, or Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and shall not be used for advertisements or product endorsements.
Funding
This work was supported by Prof. Alexandre Soares Rosado’s KAUST Baseline Grant (BAS/1/1096-01-01). Part of the research described in this publication was carried out at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research was funded by a 2006 NASA Planetary Protection Research ROSES award to KV. PS is supported through the Prime Minister’s Research Fellowship from the Ministry of Education, Government of India. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, the writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KV and NS managed the Phoenix strain collection. ASR and JS performed the Phoenix mission spacecraft strain genome sequencing. JS, ASR, and KV conceived and designed the study, and generated the draft of the manuscript with contributions from all authors. AR and NP conducted microscopy analysis and visualization. TJ and IA performed the genome assembly. PS, SKMS, and TJ conducted WGS-based phylogenetic placement, comparative genomics, genome annotation, and functional characterization with inputs from KR, NKS, and KV. PS performed biosynthetic gene cluster and biofilm-based gene analysis. PS and SKMS performed metagenomic mapping analysis. SK performed biochemical characterization of the novel species. ASR funded the project. JS and KV wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Since the study did not involve human subjects, ethics approval and consent to participate were not applicable. The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be perceived as potential conflicts of interest.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Schultz, J., Jamil, T., Sengupta, P. et al. Genomic insights into novel extremotolerant bacteria isolated from the NASA Phoenix mission spacecraft assembly cleanrooms. Microbiome 13, 117 (2025). https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-025-02082-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doiorg.publicaciones.saludcastillayleon.es/10.1186/s40168-025-02082-1