Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of Sipros 3, Sipros 4, Calisp, and MetaproSIP on E. coli standard samples

From: Proteomic stable isotope probing with an upgraded Sipros algorithm for improved identification and quantification of isotopically labeled proteins

Expected 13C atom%

1.07% 13C

2% 13C

5% 13C

25% 13C

50% 13C

99% 13C

Peptidesc

Median of 13C atom%

Sipros 4

1.1%

2.0%

5.0%

25.0%

50.0%

99.0%

Sipros 3

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

25.0%

51.0%

99.0%

Calisp

1.1%

2.0%

4.9%

NAa

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

0.8%

1.2%

5.3%

10.2%

11.8%

97.7%

MADb of 13C atom%

Sipros 4

0.0%

0.0%

1.5%

1.5%

3.0%

0.0%

Sipros 3

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

4.4%

5.2%

0.0%

Calisp

1.2%

1.3%

1.5%

NA

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

0.3%

0.1%

2.7%

5.7%

7.6%

1.0%

Count

Sipros 4

18,147

14,523

11,297

8188

7275

9901

Sipros 3

18,003

14,824

12,420

5478

2218

10,042

Calisp

5259

6936

6137

NA

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

11,695

10,131

5,741

1003

730

85

Proteins/protein groupsc

Median of 13C atom%

Sipros 4

1.1%

2.0%

5.0%

25.0%

50.0%

99.0%

Sipros 3

1.0%

1.0%

1.0%

25.0%

51.0%

99.0%

Calisp

1.1%

2.0%

4.9%

NA

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

0.8%

1.1%

2.1%

9.8%

11.2%

97.7%

MADb of 13C atom%

Sipros 4

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.5%

1.5%

0.0%

Sipros 3

0.0%

0.0%

0.0%

1.5%

3.0%

0.0%

Calisp

1.2%

1.3%

1.5%

NA

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

0.1%

0.1%

1.5%

4.7%

6.2%

0.9%

Count

Sipros 4

1815

1458

1210

973

893

1490

Sipros 3

1834

1546

1428

871

476

1491

Calisp

723

1105

973

NA

NA

NA

MetaProSIP

1592

1429

1202

549

466

59

  1. aNA data is not available because database searching failed to produce any identification
  2. bMAD median absolute deviation
  3. cFDRs at the peptide level and the protein level were controlled at 1%